Thread: Import mark
View Single Post
Unread 05-30-2022, 08:35 AM   #36
schutzen-jager
User
 
schutzen-jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: peoples republic of New Jersey
Posts: 187
Thanks: 208
Thanked 187 Times in 86 Posts
Default

First you claim it was "almost definitely" replaced by CAI before import.

Then you claim it was a used barrel when replaced. If the Finns replaced the barrel, it would have been new. ]

my first post was made before you stated the Finn connection + the stampings below the CAI mark were not clear in your picture at all - the Finns were notorious for salvaging parts to recondition weapons + with out the clear Finn markings this would be totally possible - the m23 marking makes it a Finn manufactured bbl. + stamping appears much different then CAI marking above it - my so called insult is much less cutting then you basically calling me a liar back 11/2/20 in post about Luger stocks with ground lugs in old ATF regulations - the 7.65 was standardized in 1923 by Finns -the m23 below CAi on bbl. is Finn arsenal designation - the Finns were using large quantities of Lugers + Mausers in military service as soon as they declared independence from Russia prior to 1923
schutzen-jager is offline   Reply With Quote