LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Pete Ebbink · 08-09-2002, 06:01 PM

A while back (on April 12, 2002) I wrote the BATF on a ruling if the Mitchell Arms S/S lugers might fall under the C&R classification.

I just received a reply, dated 7-31-02,from a Mr. Curtis H.A. Bartlett (Chief, Firearms Technology Branch) that these S/S lugers (by default) do not fall in the C&R status.

Later tonight or on Saturday I will fire up my scanner and post this 2-page reply; if anyone wants it for your records.

I was hoping to add one to my collection. But they cannot be sold in CA-State, unless under C&R status... <img src="graemlins/yltype.gif" border="0" alt="[typing]" />

08-09-2002, 06:01 PM	#1
Pete Ebbink User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The USA Posts: 5,919 Thanks: 0 Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts	BATF Ruling On Mitchell Arms Lugers... A while back (on April 12, 2002) I wrote the BATF on a ruling if the Mitchell Arms S/S lugers might fall under the C&R classification. I just received a reply, dated 7-31-02,from a Mr. Curtis H.A. Bartlett (Chief, Firearms Technology Branch) that these S/S lugers (by default) do not fall in the C&R status. Later tonight or on Saturday I will fire up my scanner and post this 2-page reply; if anyone wants it for your records. I was hoping to add one to my collection. But they cannot be sold in CA-State, unless under C&R status... <img src="graemlins/yltype.gif" border="0" alt="[typing]" />