LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Thor · 06-07-2001, 05:02 PM

If you cut two coils off, I do think that std ammo will hammer most guns a little hard, std ammo and the springs in the guns, even a stiff Wolff spring that is has quite a bit more tension than most older springs (agreed they have some mileage on them) work fine in all the guns I have looked out that were sound mechanically. Why batter an 80 yr gun? But these guys are the experts and I am just speaking from experience! I will shoot the std ammo and be happy my guns (and the reworks I do) rest a little easier and last a little longer! If the round has enough power to lock the toggle back EVERY TIME, there really is no reason to lessen the spring tension is there? Thor

06-07-2001, 05:02 PM	#18
Thor User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Rio Rancho, New Mexico Posts: 4,583 Thanks: 958 Thanked 970 Times in 276 Posts	Re: Whats the argument, its published data If you cut two coils off, I do think that std ammo will hammer most guns a little hard, std ammo and the springs in the guns, even a stiff Wolff spring that is has quite a bit more tension than most older springs (agreed they have some mileage on them) work fine in all the guns I have looked out that were sound mechanically. Why batter an 80 yr gun? But these guys are the experts and I am just speaking from experience! I will shoot the std ammo and be happy my guns (and the reworks I do) rest a little easier and last a little longer! If the round has enough power to lock the toggle back EVERY TIME, there really is no reason to lessen the spring tension is there? Thor