LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Sieger · 08-08-2003, 03:55 AM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by John Sabato:
[QUOTE][qb]JohnS,

--a visual check revealed that the stainless steel magazines are made of thinner metal, that even though the inside measurements may be the same the outer measurements are not, and the mag well is machined to the tight tolerance of the stainless magazine exterior.<hr /></blockquote>Dear John:

Why don't we approach AIMCO and assist them in designing a magazine that will properly feed ammo loaded to the now standard 1.169 inch length.

That, and a proper recoil spring balance, to "standard" current commercial ammo should cure the "feeding problem" quite nicely!!

How about it?

Bob

08-08-2003, 03:55 AM	#15
Sieger User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: New York, NY Posts: 1,575 Thanks: 2,124 Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by John Sabato: <strong>[QUOTE][qb]JohnS, --a visual check revealed that the stainless steel magazines are made of thinner metal, that even though the inside measurements may be the same the outer measurements are not, and the mag well is machined to the tight tolerance of the stainless magazine exterior.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Dear John: Why don't we approach AIMCO and assist them in designing a magazine that will properly feed ammo loaded to the now standard 1.169 inch length. That, and a proper recoil spring balance, to "standard" current commercial ammo should cure the "feeding problem" quite nicely!! How about it? Bob