LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

bill m · 07-12-2001, 08:16 PM

Hi Kyrie,

You're absolutely correct in that we will continue to disagree. I most cordially and respectfully disagree with just about all of your statements. Okay, this is information for the forum's knowledge, or at least reading, and if you do not want to accept or use it, that is your choice. Charlie Kenyon wrote an article in Gun Report stating the same thing, that his "1920's" were actually made after his "1923's", and that new information and research had put this into the proper perspective. I am simply using information that is common knowledge, like military serial numbering styles and commercial serial numbering styles. There is a Big Difference between a 1920 variation and a 1920 commercial. You are lumping all kinds of stuff together and just calling them 1920 commercials which is not correct, in my cordial and respectful opinion. So, don't accept it if you don't think it is correct, that is your choice, but perhaps some of the other members will find it useful and helpful, and at least interesting. Look forward to disagreeing with you again soon.

Best regards,

bill m

07-12-2001, 08:16 PM	#11
bill m User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 385 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: 1920 Commercial Lugers Hi Kyrie, You're absolutely correct in that we will continue to disagree. I most cordially and respectfully disagree with just about all of your statements. Okay, this is information for the forum's knowledge, or at least reading, and if you do not want to accept or use it, that is your choice. Charlie Kenyon wrote an article in Gun Report stating the same thing, that his "1920's" were actually made after his "1923's", and that new information and research had put this into the proper perspective. I am simply using information that is common knowledge, like military serial numbering styles and commercial serial numbering styles. There is a Big Difference between a 1920 variation and a 1920 commercial. You are lumping all kinds of stuff together and just calling them 1920 commercials which is not correct, in my cordial and respectful opinion. So, don't accept it if you don't think it is correct, that is your choice, but perhaps some of the other members will find it useful and helpful, and at least interesting. Look forward to disagreeing with you again soon. Best regards, bill m