View Single Post
Unread 08-11-2005, 12:25 PM   #12
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

Mike,

I must counter the thoughts of my good friends George and drbuster with a much more conservative viewpoint.

There existed a known system to denote weapons whose manufacture was completed in years after their chamber date. There are examples known of Erfurt Lugers following this requirement ("A Real Two-date Erfurt" (Luger Forum) ; Jan Still, "Imperial Lugers" p.78). One of the known examples has a chamber date 1914/18 ("1914 Erfurt" (Jan Still's Forum) ).

From a collection standpoint, this 1914 Erfurt will always be questionable due to the lack of a certifiable explanation for its radically out-of-place serial number. While it "could" have come to be by the proffered speculation, this is not enough to warrant its authenticity, or to place a value on it as an original.

Too bad, too, because on the face of it this is a really nice looking Luger.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote