View Single Post
Unread 08-11-2005, 01:12 AM   #5
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,908
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts
Default

Doc,

I'm sceptical of the 'spare' 1914 receivers. Remember they were subject to the marking instruction which required the /date stamp for a dated receiver assembled into a gun at a later date.

Not that I have an answer to where these guns come fron...

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote