LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Vlim · 07-23-2005, 12:00 PM

Murray,

Nope. It's fine without the proof. Should've mentioned that

I still believe the 1914 is not so much an issue-date as well as some sort of fix date. Perhaps one of the locals messed it up while it was brand new

I agree with George that the rod may well be a locally made (late) replacement. As these rigs did serve during WW2 some improvisation must have occurred here and there.

07-23-2005, 12:00 PM	#18
Vlim Moderator Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Europe Posts: 5,053 Thanks: 1,036 Thanked 3,991 Times in 1,205 Posts	Murray, Nope. It's fine without the proof. Should've mentioned that I still believe the 1914 is not so much an issue-date as well as some sort of fix date. Perhaps one of the locals messed it up while it was brand new I agree with George that the rod may well be a locally made (late) replacement. As these rigs did serve during WW2 some improvisation must have occurred here and there.