LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Jan C Still · 06-30-2005, 04:23 PM

Aother attempt was made to sell this same fake K date Navy (sn 2021, 0.1750) to another collector. This seller is also reported to be from Minnesota. It is my understanding that the fake information was conveyed to the seller at the first attempt to sell. It is interesting that the two matching mags appear to have been slightly altered in the area of the S marking between sale attempts. Link below:
Jan

K Date Navy Luger: opinions please Tom Whiteman http://www.gunboards.com/luger/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5076

06-30-2005, 04:23 PM	#60
Jan C Still User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Box 240188, Douglas, Alaska, 99824 Posts: 463 Thanks: 0 Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts	Aother attempt was made to sell this same fake K date Navy (sn 2021, 0.1750) to another collector. This seller is also reported to be from Minnesota. It is my understanding that the fake information was conveyed to the seller at the first attempt to sell. It is interesting that the two matching mags appear to have been slightly altered in the area of the S marking between sale attempts. Link below: Jan K Date Navy Luger: opinions please Tom Whiteman http://www.gunboards.com/luger/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5076