View Single Post
Unread 03-25-2005, 07:22 PM   #4
Stu
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 452
Thanks: 4
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Default

I think George has a very valid point and if the gun has no significant corrosion you might just want to preserve it as the piece of history that it is.

On the other hand if the actual metal surfaces have deteriorated much the Thor option is very valid. It's not easy to see from the pictures how much actual surface damage has occurred.

My Thor restored 1916 Erfurt is a wonderful gun. You can't over-estimate the quality of the work he does.
Stu is offline   Reply With Quote