View Single Post
Unread 10-01-2002, 05:12 PM   #4
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,742
Thanks: 826
Thanked 1,788 Times in 590 Posts
Post

Jan, while I agree with your interpretation of the markings, aren't they well outside of the approved sequence? Wouldn't it be more correct if it read: "R.J.R.65.M.G.K.2.6."?

In past correspondence with Rheinhardt Kornmayer, he stated that Imperial markings often deviated from the regulations. It seems to me that the markings on this Luger are not IAW the regs. (I'm at work and don't have my books handy so I may be all wet but I don't think I am.)

Anyway, I'm just curious as to your thoughts on this.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote