LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Pete Ebbink · 03-03-2004, 11:42 AM

Here is a nice reply I received from the holster seller :

" I personally have never found any concrete evidence to support my opinion. However, in discussing this over the years with many of my collector friends we all seem to feel that it highly possible that 44 dated holsters were for the Kreighoff pistols. It is a reasonable conjecture in that no lugers other than kreighoffs were being manufactured at that time. However, it is possible that they were for the 42 BYF's that were being assembled from existing store. Like so much of what we often arrive at..it is generally someones opinion. One thing that is a fact ...the 44 dated or un-dated Luger holsters are very rare. "

Regards,

Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />

03-03-2004, 11:42 AM	#8
Pete Ebbink User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The USA Posts: 5,919 Thanks: 0 Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts	Here is a nice reply I received from the holster seller : " I personally have never found any concrete evidence to support my opinion. However, in discussing this over the years with many of my collector friends we all seem to feel that it highly possible that 44 dated holsters were for the Kreighoff pistols. It is a reasonable conjecture in that no lugers other than kreighoffs were being manufactured at that time. However, it is possible that they were for the 42 BYF's that were being assembled from existing store. Like so much of what we often arrive at..it is generally someones opinion. One thing that is a fact ...the 44 dated or un-dated Luger holsters are very rare. " Regards, Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />