LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Dwight Gruber · 08-08-2003, 09:24 AM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by John Sabato:
[QUOTE]So Dwight (& Steve), it seems that you ARE confirming what I proposed... IF the mag well on a stainless Luger were opened up to original specifications, it would appear that it would then fit and function with vintage magazines, but would no longer fit and function with the newer and thinner Stainless mags... Is that what you are saying?<hr /></blockquote>Uh...sure...I thought you were just talking about cutting a channel for the rolled--or extruded--rib.

--Dwight

08-08-2003, 09:24 AM	#16
Dwight Gruber User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Portland, Oregon Posts: 3,908 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1,330 Times in 435 Posts	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by John Sabato: <strong>[QUOTE]So Dwight (& Steve), it seems that you ARE confirming what I proposed... IF the mag well on a stainless Luger were opened up to original specifications, it would appear that it would then fit and function with vintage magazines, but would no longer fit and function with the newer and thinner Stainless mags... Is that what you are saying?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Uh...sure...I thought you were just talking about cutting a channel for the rolled--or extruded--rib. --Dwight