View Single Post
Unread 09-04-2003, 06:57 PM   #7
wterrell
User
 
wterrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

No flame. But please be candid and site your source for the machining procedure at Springfield Armory in the year 1903.

Are your sources for the procedure followed for the WWII rifles or the first models ever produced?

May we see pics of the perfect match of the "draw" lines on the Springfield 03 as has been shown for the Luger?

Does the Springfield 1903 have an obround as the front sight blade mount as an integral part of the barrel as does the Luger? Or is it a separate piece of metal?

Which of the manufacturers of the Springfield used the methods sited by you.

(As an aside: Common sense did not rule the day, concerning the Springfield 1903. Teddy Roosevelt remarked that the rod bayonet of the 03 model was a most idiotic invention.)
__________________
Noli me vocare, ego te vocabo,
wes
--------------------
wterrell is offline   Reply With Quote