[Edward Tinker]

I doubt it Brad.

I think that Pete is trying to steer towards facts that new people like me can see and maybe don't have the background or knowledge of others that you and Jan might have?

I think that Pete is trying to be objective, but it is easy to be pushed into a corner. The objective of all at this forum should be to show what a guns history is and what might have happened to it. I don't mind putting 2 + 2 together but I try hard not to put this information and this information together if I am guessing and don't have hard facts. That is my law enforcement background, you can make a conjecture, but you really shouldn't decide if they are guilty or not, that is up to the jury.

Maybe that is what we should decide, with what facts we have, we can only conjecture or guess?