View Single Post
Unread 05-07-2001, 12:39 PM   #6
tony k
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default You're correct! ctxt

Yup, it's 135. not 735. Ah, the joys of getting older. More insight, less eyesight :-(


BTW, the takedown tool -- which I doubt is original to this byf -- is proofed 655. I asked Ralph Shattuck about swapping to a 135-proof tool, and he allowed as how some of the early 135-proofed byfs came with 655 tools!


Anyone have a more precise production date for my byf 41, #960a?



tony k is offline