Thread: Luger disaster
View Single Post
Unread 08-30-2002, 02:55 PM   #48
Garfield
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A little SE of Nome
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

John S:

Time permitting, I'll see if I can turn up the information requested. However, per you admission, if such comments are made to explain why a pistol was of a lesser quality than that as represented by a dealer, then, IMHO, the implication is that, for that reason, the dealer should not be held accountable.

Granted, you and I do not see eye-to-eye on some of these issues and I respect your right to disagree. And, perhaps, I imagined that such a thing was ever implied by a member of this forum.

One fact does remain, Rjennings indicates that members of this forum have conveyed the message that "a dealer handles many guns & cannot know everything about every weapon". Since this statemment was made during a discussion regarding the responsibilies of a dealer to a client, it would appear that Rjennings, at least, was lead to believe that such reasoning was a valid excuse for a pistol to be less than as represented by the dealer.
Garfield is offline   Reply With Quote