I completely agree with Garfield’s two points. Just because a dealer handles and sells “a lot of guns” positively does not absolve him of responsibility for each individual sale. Using this kind of preposterous thinking, anyone could argue to his boss at work that he is “not accountable” for a screw-up because he had a lot of work to do that day, that Ford or GM are not responsible for the safety of the car you drive in because they make so many cars each day, or that your bank and credit card company are absolved of keeping accurate records because they have so many clients.
And like Garfield says, it is utterly ridiculous to come back with the “it’s still worth the same amount of money” BS after a collectable has been revealed for its true flawed condition, like that outrageous blemish. That approach is the epitome of being fast-talked by some con artist.
I am keeping careful track of any negative feedback made for Luger dealers here in this forum. Even one, and I will not deal with them. That may sound harsh, but it’s my own hard earned money to spend as I wish. And please don’t make any lame excuses for them. If you still have a warm and fuzzy feeling about a dealer who has gotten a serious negative feedback, you are more then welcome to continue to risk your own money with them.
|