LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Pete Ebbink · 06-09-2002, 10:38 PM

Hello Jim,

Thanks for the follow-up post and also Johnny's explanation.

I think I got on that wrong "1926" track, Jim, when your first photo post read as :

" My first Artillery (1926), sorry no rig! "

Your typo got me thinking/confused about 1926 arty's...

p.s. I, too, was tempted by this 1923 Artillery, as well. I decided on another arty from 1918 (also from the WOL's) because it had moderate wear & tear and possibly saw some WWI use (assumption only on my part). I went after this other arty when I realized mints are great, but guns with wear & tear and history are equally as exciting in my collection ! After seeing your photo posting, I am beginning to wonder if I chose the right arty...
<img src="graemlins/crying.gif" border="0" alt="[crying]" />

06-09-2002, 10:38 PM	#12
Pete Ebbink User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The USA Posts: 5,919 Thanks: 0 Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts	Hello Jim, Thanks for the follow-up post and also Johnny's explanation. I think I got on that wrong "1926" track, Jim, when your first photo post read as : " My first Artillery (1926), sorry no rig! " Your typo got me thinking/confused about 1926 arty's... p.s. I, too, was tempted by this 1923 Artillery, as well. I decided on another arty from 1918 (also from the WOL's) because it had moderate wear & tear and possibly saw some WWI use (assumption only on my part). I went after this other arty when I realized mints are great, but guns with wear & tear and history are equally as exciting in my collection ! After seeing your photo posting, I am beginning to wonder if I chose the right arty... <img src="graemlins/crying.gif" border="0" alt="[crying]" />