LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

John Sabato · 12-13-2002, 02:00 PM

Nice catch Pete, you are correct. I missed that because I was so distracted about the rear site configuration...

This being the case, this gun could not legally be used with a shoulder stock because it is not originally a true artillery model. Use of a shoulder stock would require paying the $200 NFA tax for assembling a short barreled rifle (SBR).

All that said. It is still a very nice looking Luger long barreled shooter... I would love to know how well it shoots Submarine Vet...

12-13-2002, 02:00 PM	#9
John Sabato Lifer Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The Capital of the Free World Posts: 10,156 Thanks: 3,003 Thanked 2,308 Times in 1,098 Posts	Nice catch Pete, you are correct. I missed that because I was so distracted about the rear site configuration... This being the case, this gun could not legally be used with a shoulder stock because it is not originally a true artillery model. Use of a shoulder stock would require paying the $200 NFA tax for assembling a short barreled rifle (SBR). All that said. It is still a very nice looking Luger long barreled shooter... I would love to know how well it shoots Submarine Vet... __________________ regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL *and are endowed by their Creator* with certain UNALIENABLE* rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."*