In my opinion, I feel that the rig is correct but I would have preferred to see a Type II TM-08 with a 1918 dated rig. Nonetheless, the condition of the the Type I TM-08 is great.
In regards to the spare magazines, I question slightly the '+' on the second/third spare magazine, but the magazine would need to be examined closely. It is reasonable to say that spare magazines for LP-08 rigs could have been numbered or simply left blank. However, if the rig has three magazines in total and two are correct, that is good enough - I would not complain!
Can someone else please comment on the K.R.A.G inside the flap? Is that the mark of a commercial reseller?
Albert
|