LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Ron Smith · 07-29-2004, 12:01 PM

Howard, I will submit to your superior knowledge,and expertise as far as the subject of Lugers. However, I still feel that the uniform finish wear and close fit of the components, belies the parts gun theory. It still looks like a period rework to me. If it is a parts gun, it was assembled very proffessionaly. And with great care in matching up the parts. And if refinished? Was done along time ago. Just my opinion, based on 40 yrs of owning and studying various old firearms. I cannot claim to be a Luger expert, and would not proport to be.

Ron

07-29-2004, 12:01 PM	#20
Ron Smith User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Orygun Posts: 4,243 Thanks: 118 Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts	Howard, I will submit to your superior knowledge,and expertise as far as the subject of Lugers. However, I still feel that the uniform finish wear and close fit of the components, belies the parts gun theory. It still looks like a period rework to me. If it is a parts gun, it was assembled very proffessionaly. And with great care in matching up the parts. And if refinished? Was done along time ago. Just my opinion, based on 40 yrs of owning and studying various old firearms. I cannot claim to be a Luger expert, and would not proport to be. Ron __________________ I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said...