[Ron Wood]

This is another one of those enigmas that turn up from time to time. It is definitely a 1906 9mm pattern Luger, but the serial number is WAY out of range. Published serial number ranges are based on observed examples and a lot of experience on the part of the individual authors that compile and publish the information. In all probability, a â??typeâ? Luger will fall within these expected rangesâ?¦but there always seems to be an exception. For example, Kenyon states that 1914 Commercials were in the 71500-73500 range, but I once owned #74745. To top that off, Still has serial number 74745 listed as a 7.65mm, but it is actually 9mm! (no kidding, I owned it and I know that for a fact).

Peteâ??s description of a 1913 Commercial is correct with respect to the accepted configuration of that model. I have #71247 and it has a stock lug and is marked GESICHERT in the upper position. (By the way, I donâ??t think mine is one of the â??6 reportedâ? in Kenyon, so I suspect there are a few more around)

So where does that leave us? Truthfully, I donâ??t know, but my guesses would be:

1. A special order that requested a no stock lug configuration that was constructed in the 1913 timeframe, hence the late serial number, but made up from 1906 components on hand.

2. A rework of a â??realâ? 1913 Commercial that someone thought was â??incorrectâ? since it had a grip safety therefore it â??shouldâ? also have a polished safety and not have a stock lug. This is unlikely unless there is evidence that the stock lug has been ground and the GESICHERT welded up and obliterated.

3. A deliberate fake designed to create an ultra rare variation.

This example, #72646, is a lovely looking weapon, and from the pictures appears to be authentic. Pending answers to Peteâ??s ground stock lug question and my thought on an obliterated GESICHERT, I would venture that guess #1 is the most likely and Frank owns #7 (or #8, or #9â?¦.?) known 1913 Commercial.

Great looking rig Frank. Congratulations.