LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

John D. · 10-07-2003, 08:40 PM

Hi Hugh,

I've never seen a KU below 3 digits. Further, it appears to me, based on Gibson's reference and updated information since that publication, that the KU "production" spanned a number of toggles/chamber dated marks - but serialization was fairly consistient.

I'm not convinced that of evidence doesn't point to something more conclusive about KU and their manufacturing/production mystery....

Anyway - 1834 would cerainly be lower, but is the KU a prefix or suffix to that number??? Any photos??!

Best to you!

10-07-2003, 08:40 PM	#6
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 478 Thanked 517 Times in 129 Posts	Hi Hugh, I've never seen a KU below 3 digits. Further, it appears to me, based on Gibson's reference and updated information since that publication, that the KU "production" spanned a number of toggles/chamber dated marks - but serialization was fairly consistient. I'm not convinced that of evidence doesn't point to something more conclusive about KU and their manufacturing/production mystery.... Anyway - 1834 would cerainly be lower, but is the KU a prefix or suffix to that number??? Any photos??! Best to you!