LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Pete Ebbink · 08-26-2003, 01:37 AM

In Robert Marvin's booklet of luger proofs on page 85, Mr. Marvin postulated that what appeared to be Krieghoff proofs on the Ku pistols were not exactly such and might have been a proof for another service (i.e. coastal flying service...).

Would anyone that does have a Ku take detailed, close-up photos of these proofs; so folks could see if they are real HK proofs or not...

Mr. Marvin speculated that Ku pistols were Mauser-made...he then states that HK may been invovled in the production of these Mauser-made guns...(but the Jone's letter would seem to settle that issue...).

So maybe Mauser made the Ku's for another service and used a "similar" proof to HK proofs...(?????).

Regards,

Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />

08-26-2003, 01:37 AM	#11
Pete Ebbink User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The USA Posts: 5,919 Thanks: 0 Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts	In Robert Marvin's booklet of luger proofs on page 85, Mr. Marvin postulated that what appeared to be Krieghoff proofs on the Ku pistols were not exactly such and might have been a proof for another service (i.e. coastal flying service...). Would anyone that does have a Ku take detailed, close-up photos of these proofs; so folks could see if they are real HK proofs or not... Mr. Marvin speculated that Ku pistols were Mauser-made...he then states that HK may been invovled in the production of these Mauser-made guns...(but the Jone's letter would seem to settle that issue...). So maybe Mauser made the Ku's for another service and used a "similar" proof to HK proofs...(?????). Regards, Pete... <img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />