View Single Post
Unread 09-14-2019, 03:37 PM   #9
Olle
User
 
Olle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 159
Thanked 664 Times in 318 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadster 02 View Post
Read it again.

1. Anyone with outstanding warrant be prohibited is a proposed change to backround checks.

2. Giving NICS more than 3 days is also a proposed change to backround checks.

Sounds like changes to "gun laws" to me. As I said before, "no more unconstitutional gun laws", thank you very much.
The changes the author proposes are not in the laws (even if he happens to say so), what he's saying is that current laws would work quite well if they looked over the way they're enforced.

First, somebody with an outstanding warrant should be defined as a fugitive from justice, and I really don't have a problem with that. People of questionable character are the ones that cause the problems for us law abiding gun owners.

Second, NICS obviously has a problem with the 3 day time frame, and many transactions (more than 4,000 in 2018) would have been denied if NICS would have had the resources to really do it in 3 days. I sure don't have a problem with giving NICS ample resources to stop criminals from obtaining guns. Again, this is the kind of people that give us all a bad name and make the politicians come up with new "feel good" laws.

With the changes the author proposes, the current laws don't need to be revised. That's what we all want, isn't it?
__________________
Deer Hollow Enterprises, LLC
Gun repair and restoration
Olle is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to Olle for your post: