View Single Post
Unread 01-07-2018, 12:32 PM   #1
Sergio Natali
User
 
Sergio Natali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere in Northern Italy
Posts: 2,646
Thanks: 1,087
Thanked 1,783 Times in 1,007 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4 Scale View Post
I am finding that my own personal definition of collectible is evolving. I started out mostly in the camp G.T. describes, +85% original finish and all matching parts. Then I discovered in practice, the acid test of collectible or not, for me personally is, am I willing to shoot it after I get it? I have found I don't like to shoot all matching pistols with a quality refinish, or pistols with 60% or better original finish that have all or mostly matching small parts.

I'm also finding that for collectibles, I prefer pistols with visible wear over prisintine examples.

Interestingly, this link defines 'collectible' as matching with 60% or better original finish remaining. Go to the 'general information' tab and look at the FAQ http://www.lugerforum.com/

Very interesting thread.

To me a collectible is seriously “a collectible” only it has three qualities: it must be
scarce
original
and at least in fairly good condition.
__________________
"Originality can't be restored and should be at the top of any collector's priority list.

Last edited by Sergio Natali; 01-08-2018 at 05:27 AM.
Sergio Natali is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Sergio Natali for your post: