View Single Post
Unread 11-28-2017, 09:38 AM   #1
DonVoigt
User
 
DonVoigt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,356 Times in 2,041 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill_in_VA View Post
There’s no harm in prudence, but what I provided is far from “nebulous.” I’ll say though, I’m curious if you and others will demonstrate the same sense of...”concern” and assertiveness the next time someone posts a photo of Luger with a stock not specifically listed under Section III of the C&R list.
Anyway, I’ve said my piece and backed it up with statute and fact and case law, not emotion and panic.
Good grief Bill, I see no sign of "emotion or panic" here; and we have been consistent in saying that the stock is ok till "attached"(probably).

We do advise or warn guys about stock compatibility when odd combinations are posted. Some folks know about the rules, but many do not.

While you are correct that lugers and stocks may not be high on the ATF list for things to "go after", if they even have one, there are known "rules" that folks should be aware of and if one chooses one can stay inside the lines.

One thing that makes this one particularly egregious is that the stock is not remotely similar to any "original" stock , which are enumerated in the references you mention.

And that is all I have to say about that.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector.
Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie
DonVoigt is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 6 members says Thank You to DonVoigt for your post: