View Single Post
Unread 07-07-2017, 12:36 AM   #26
Sieger
User
 
Sieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Gruber View Post
There is another pertinent difference between the 7,65 Parabellum cartridge and the DWM 9x19 round (actually, a couple of pertinent differences).

With the too-short 9mm round, the bullets snag on the top edge of the chamber. The 7,65 bullet, being narrower, does not present its ogive to the top of the chamber, so does not get caught up even if the OAL is a fraction shorter.

The original 9x19mm design used a truncated-cone bullet. Although not specifically designed this way for proper feeding, it coincidentally successfully mimics the ogive properties of the 7,65mm round. Some modern Winchester 9mm ball ammunition has a gently truncated-cone bullet.

--Dwight
Dwight;

Taking a good look at that very angled grip, I think you will find that the cartridges loaded toward the bottom of the eight shot magazine cause the upper most cartridges to cant downwardly. This downward canting is the source of the infamous "Luger Jam".

This is why proper OAL is so critical with this design.

This is true for both the 9mm and the 7.65mm.

Sieger
Sieger is offline   Reply With Quote