View Single Post
Unread 07-04-2017, 11:42 PM   #13
Sieger
User
 
Sieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwight Gruber View Post
There is another pertinent difference between the 7,65 Parabellum cartridge and the DWM 9x19 round (actually, a couple of pertinent differences).

With the too-short 9mm round, the bullets snag on the top edge of the chamber. The 7,65 bullet, being narrower, does not present its ogive to the top of the chamber, so does not get caught up even if the OAL is a fraction shorter.

The original 9x19mm design used a truncated-cone bullet. Although not specifically designed this way for proper feeding, it coincidentally successfully mimics the ogive properties of the 7,65mm round. Some modern Winchester 9mm ball ammunition has a gently truncated-cone bullet.

--Dwight
Dwight;

As long as I follow the correct procedure in properly determining OAL, I've never experienced jamming with any TC or RN bullet of proper weight and configuration (most typically available brands).

The correct OAL for the RN 9mm bullet is also 1.173 inches, NOT the later derived SAMMI, so often misquoted, 1.169 inches.

For a review, our readers might enjoy reading, in the Reloading Sticky Section, "How to Determine Proper OAL with a New Bullet" as it will answer many of their questions.

Sieger
Sieger is offline   Reply With Quote