View Single Post
Unread 06-13-2017, 08:50 PM   #22
4 Scale
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 544
Thanks: 194
Thanked 489 Times in 251 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonVoigt View Post
Some parts need to be hard, others, ductile or malleable...
With respect the article's comments on hardness apply only to the frame. Absent compelling data to the contrary, hardness in such a part would seem a desirable property. Of course harness alone is not the sole criteria, nor did I say it was. I look at it as, the data suggest the steel spec changed and when competent mfgrs. change specs, they do it to improve either cost or performance. As my references don't mention any P 08 cost declines due to changes in the steel spec., I estimate it is performance ('better'). YMMV.

In your last post, I find your opinions interesting, well said and I share many of them. But I thought the rules were 'facts only'.It is an interesting thread, thanks for starting. I find my views as to Parabellum design and materials are continually evolving and I will check back to see if there is new info.
4 Scale is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to 4 Scale for your post: