LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post - Revisions-Commission

Vlim · 09-07-2004, 05:56 PM

Hi,

Dwight is right. Goertz also quotes the commission description in his book 'Die Pistole 08'

A rough translation:

"If there is doubt about the functionality or acceptance of a piece, or if the given piece's size is smaller than the tolerances for that piece, in order to prevent a shorter lifespan or problems with cooperation with other parts, the piece is to be presented to the 'Waffenoberrevisor'. If the piece is subsequently accepted in the name of the 'Verwaltungsdirektor' it must contain both the stamp of the acceptant and the 'RC' stamp, to safeguard the acceptant from possible future liabilities."

It is not a repair or rework proof. It just signifies that the part has been accepted after the acceptant noticed that acceptance tolerances were not met, had the part checked by his boss, who approved acceptance.

09-07-2004, 05:56 PM	#6
Vlim Moderator Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Europe Posts: 5,053 Thanks: 1,036 Thanked 3,990 Times in 1,205 Posts	Hi, Dwight is right. Goertz also quotes the commission description in his book 'Die Pistole 08' A rough translation: "If there is doubt about the functionality or acceptance of a piece, or if the given piece's size is smaller than the tolerances for that piece, in order to prevent a shorter lifespan or problems with cooperation with other parts, the piece is to be presented to the 'Waffenoberrevisor'. If the piece is subsequently accepted in the name of the 'Verwaltungsdirektor' it must contain both the stamp of the acceptant and the 'RC' stamp, to safeguard the acceptant from possible future liabilities." It is not a repair or rework proof. It just signifies that the part has been accepted after the acceptant noticed that acceptance tolerances were not met, had the part checked by his boss, who approved acceptance.