LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Rick W. · 03-16-2017, 01:50 PM

I am far from being right at times, but the attempt is still there. One has to get beat on for whatever to keep the faith sorta speak.

you might take a look at the first equation for tangent of the angle. Is it 8.1 or 81.1?

My stuff is not completely right either, as used a component of barrel length rather than sight radius.

Thanks for the nice presentation and pictorial; lot more than I did.

regards,

Rick W.

03-16-2017, 01:50 PM	#26
Rick W. User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 339 Thanks: 81 Thanked 359 Times in 198 Posts	I am far from being right at times, but the attempt is still there. One has to get beat on for whatever to keep the faith sorta speak. you might take a look at the first equation for tangent of the angle. Is it 8.1 or 81.1? My stuff is not completely right either, as used a component of barrel length rather than sight radius. Thanks for the nice presentation and pictorial; lot more than I did. regards, Rick W.