View Single Post
Unread 07-19-2016, 01:25 PM   #7
DonVoigt
User
 
DonVoigt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,355 Times in 2,041 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl View Post
Don,
I completely agree that the Luger striker spring is much stronger than necessary. However, I can't see how the stronger spring would be the determining factor in the failure of the breech block at this point. It seems to me that the wear to the striker guide retaining lug is the combined result of ammo that is too hot, causing the the striker guide to be pushed back and forth as it hits the frame, and a lack of lubrication.
KFS
Well,
the spring is what pushes the retainer to the rear, without it it would not lock in, any "extra" pressure =more wear.

I never said it was the only factor, only that the spring is much stronger than needed and a big factor in this type of wear, IMO.

Lubrication is always good; and yes, in "normal" operation the guide should not contact the rear of the frame.

It would take a Lot of shooting and/or firing higher power loads to do this.

It is not a really common failure, again JMHO.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector.
Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie
DonVoigt is offline   Reply With Quote