On the subject of shooting, per the comments of several it seems there may be increased risk of damage vs. a later production pistol with better metallurgy. However I think the excellent price you paid makes this pistol a shooter candidate. That's because if you were to purchase a later production Mauser in comparable condition for shooting, it's going to cost at least what you paid for this gun. Phrased differently, purely from a risk standpoint, paying an additional $800 or more for another pistol, to prevent damage to an $800 pistol, does not make arithmetical/financial sense.
I know some collectors will say, "but what about the history that could be lost?" I respect that view but address the issue in a different way. In my opinion, all original Luger production - from complete matching pistols down to individual parts - are historic artifacts. I also think shooting is part of the reward and motivation for ownership and careful preservation. So I view it as a cost question - lower cost pistols are acceptable to shoot, but as the cost of the pistol goes up, shooting makes less sense.
|