View Single Post
Unread 01-19-2016, 10:41 AM   #18
DonVoigt
User
 
DonVoigt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,356 Times in 2,041 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrerick View Post
To be clear, the "hump" is not the addition of metal at the rear of the receiver.

The presence of the "hump" is actually the result of an additional milling procedure which removed metal below the area of the rear toggle hinge.

After the early 1937 engineering change, new receivers all had the "hump". It is, of course, possible that older receivers were used out of manufacturing sequence...

I wonder why Mauser stopped milling away the area from 1935 until 1937? It was certainly a reduction of labor and time to manufacture...

Marc
I wonder why they ever started,and again why it was resumed?
As you say, extra and seemingly un-necessary work.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector.
Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie
DonVoigt is offline   Reply With Quote