View Single Post
Unread 11-29-2003, 07:26 PM   #10
Tony S.
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 173
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Here are some pics of the Luger in question. <a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/closeup_barrel.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/closeup_barrel.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>
<a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/closseup_frame.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/closseup_frame.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>
<a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/box_copy2.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/box_copy2.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>
<a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/left_copy1.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/left_copy1.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>

A couple of things noted:
1. No commercial proof marks
2. "US" markings
3. 3 semi-drilled holes on receiver lug?
4. Small proof mark forward of the receiver lug
I have some other pics if interested. This gun, together with 1900 AE #6850 and 1902 AE CC #22424 (U. S. Government Trials) came from same owner who supposedly bought them from the Springfield Armory.

Thanks, Tony
Tony S. is offline   Reply With Quote