Hi Don, as you well know, too little is a killer, and too little would definitely create problems such as we have been battling for quite awhile!....

.... I am trying at this point to see what the original minimum, and also average dimension is, to arrive at a workable compromise?... It has the fit the loader as well, and with a lot of bending to the loaders insert lip limits, I find it will just barely accept 1.140" so, that is obviously outside the long dimension parameter for compatibility? And, also, 1.035" is an area where we already know the demon dwells! .....

... It's really looking like 1.100" to 1.110" is going to be ideal?....probably start at 1.120" and see how everything pans out.....

... we're close.... Stay tuned, Best to you Don, til...lat'r...GT.........