Thread: U-Boat 110
View Single Post
Unread 10-03-2015, 04:19 PM   #2
m1903a3
User
 
m1903a3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 199
Thanks: 26
Thanked 319 Times in 113 Posts
Default It was UB-110, not U-110

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curly1 View Post
It's an interesting article, but like so much of today's news is inaccurate and suffers from shallow reporting.

The photos came from this site: https://www.flickr.com/photos/twm_ne...7633570788096/

The beginning correctly describes her as UB-110, but goes on to conflate her with U-110, an entirely different submarine.

The U-boat that is the subject of the photos, and was rammed, sunk and subsequently raised by the Royal Navy was a UB III class boat, UB-110. The UB boats were smaller, shorter range coastal subs. They were used in the waters surrounding the UK. Her commander was Werner Fürbringer, who was a very successful U-boat ace credited with sinking over a 100 ships. Rather than dying in 1918, he was taken prisoner and later went on to be a Vice Admiral in WWII.

http://uboat.net/wwi/boats/index.html?boat=UB+110

http://uboat.net/wwi/men/commanders/81.html

The U-boat commanded by Kroll that sank 10 ships was U-110, a larger long range boat that could patrol all the way to the US. Kroll was KIA when U-110 was sunk.

http://uboat.net/wwi/boats/index.html?boat=110

http://uboat.net/wwi/men/commanders/163.html
__________________
- Mike
Life member: NRA, OVMS, VGCA
Member: NAPCA, N-SSA(Veteran)

Si vis pacem, para bellum
m1903a3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to m1903a3 for your post: