The answer to the question about re-importing US manufactured firearms is a bit complex.
I believe that it relates to the ownership of the firearm while it was overseas.
If the firearm belonged to the US government while overseas (like the M1 Garand rifles that were loaned by the US government to Greece, for example) they do not have to be import marked.
I recently bought a Smith and Wesson model 10 revolver that had been used by the Victoria Austrialia police. It was traded in to Smith and Wesson for a newer model S&W pistol. Thus, when it re-entered the US, it belonged to S&W. It was not import marked.
If the M1 Garands owned by countries that we sold them to like Korea will have to be import marked if we ever allow re-importation.
The Sturgess collection was import marked as required by Federal law.
I don't think import marking improves the value of firearms. Most collectors of WW-II firearms think it reduces the value of a firearm since it is evidence it wasn't brought in to the USA during or right after the war. Other collectors just consider is evidence of the history of the firearm. Finally some consider it an alteration and flaw that reduces firearm value.
Ultimately this impact is up to the buyer and seller.
Marc
__________________
 Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
|