LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post - Borchardt-Luger Controversy

Kyrie · 08-18-2002, 04:39 PM

Hi Unspellable!

Iâ??d disagree only with your terminology :-)

Seriously, and in the interests of clarity and of comradeship, may I suggest we use the terminology from the â??Parts and Disassemblyâ? page on this Forum? I think we may both disagree with the terminology used there, but that terminology has the advantage being easily accessible to all, and is complete with a parts diagram so folks who havenâ??t spent a lot of time inside a Luger can at least see which parts are being discussed.

Just a suggestion :-)

Warm regards,

Kyrie
Moderator - Cruffler_Forum on Yahoo Groups
"The flame free C&R Forum."

08-18-2002, 04:39 PM	#55
Kyrie User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 757 Thanks: 0 Thanked 212 Times in 101 Posts	Hi Unspellable! Iâ??d disagree only with your terminology :-) Seriously, and in the interests of clarity and of comradeship, may I suggest we use the terminology from the â??Parts and Disassemblyâ? page on this Forum? I think we may both disagree with the terminology used there, but that terminology has the advantage being easily accessible to all, and is complete with a parts diagram so folks who havenâ??t spent a lot of time inside a Luger can at least see which parts are being discussed. Just a suggestion :-) Warm regards, Kyrie Moderator - Cruffler_Forum on Yahoo Groups "The flame free C&R Forum."