View Single Post
Unread 06-17-2014, 05:34 PM   #9
guns3545
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 438
Thanks: 661
Thanked 493 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cirelaw View Post
John your my hero! You more than anyone was simply explained the process. I'm posting my Kriegoff that has unbelievably finish. Did they us a different process?
Eric,

HK used salt bluing, same as Mauser. The difference in finish, primarily is the better surface preparation. Simply put, they did a better job polishing the parts before bluing. Took a little more time and effort.

Same is true for interchangeability standards. They were remarkably better than Mauser as a result of machining to a closer tolerance. Much less hand fitting and fewer rejections than Mauser for head space issues.

But in all fairness HK operated almost like a custom shop compared to Mauser. To put things into perspective, the entire HK first contract of 10,000 guns was produced from late 1935 to beginning of 1938, call it 26-27 months, or 113 working weeks. Mauser typically produced that many P.08s in 3 1/2 working weeks and they consistently did, on average 10-12,000 guns per month from 1934 to 1942. And...many, many improvements to the gun along the way while eliminating unnecessary steps and simplifying production.

John
guns3545 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to guns3545 for your post: