Quote:
Originally Posted by Norme
This particular gun has been the subject of prolonged debate on Jan Still's forum. The problem with Noncom's interpretation (which was also mine) is that Artillery Regiments did not have companies, they had Abteilungs and Battereien.
Regards, Norm
http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...-95-1-K-8-quot |
Well, more hours looking, researching, reading............it's a love/hate hobby finding historical data.
I guess it 'could' be as someone else on Dan's Boards pointed out:
Recruiting Depot of the Field Artillery Regt 95 "BUT" was it a 'company' or a 'battery'?? I can't find any 'depot' info but I will say this, for artillery battery to be called "battery' they would have to have 'guns'. A recruiting/depot company would not have any 'guns'. (artillery pieces)
Not to distract from the OP's thread but a bit of trivia:
Why do the call the Artillery the "King of Battle" and the Infantry the "Queen of Battle"?