LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

tom · 04-04-2002, 06:03 PM

To John Sabato,

Not to put too fine a point on it John, but the courts have held that it is the "iron" or attaching yoke when possessed with an ineligible pistol, that constituted the illegal act. The wood without the iron but with the pistol is legal. Hence so many C96 Mausers with "ironless" holster stocks.

FWIW,

Tom

04-04-2002, 06:03 PM	#13
tom User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 269 Thanks: 0 Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts	Re: This gun could be LEGALLY owned To John Sabato, Not to put too fine a point on it John, but the courts have held that it is the "iron" or attaching yoke when possessed with an ineligible pistol, that constituted the illegal act. The wood without the iron but with the pistol is legal. Hence so many C96 Mausers with "ironless" holster stocks. FWIW, Tom