LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

drbuster · 11-23-2012, 12:55 AM

I would vote for 100% original in all respects. The magazine bottom could have been ground down or just a field armorer's replacement. The acceptance markings on the right receiver are those of the late G dates.

11-23-2012, 12:55 AM	#6
drbuster User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: San Mateo, California Posts: 1,432 Thanks: 2 Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts	I would vote for 100% original in all respects. The magazine bottom could have been ground down or just a field armorer's replacement. The acceptance markings on the right receiver are those of the late G dates.