View Single Post
Unread 11-22-2012, 05:29 AM   #11
lew1
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,108
Thanks: 82
Thanked 204 Times in 112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrerick View Post
What does this have to do with confiscation?

More importantly, exactly what is constitutional about this kind of restraint of trade? Seems to violate at least a couple of the amendments.

Have these lists ever been challenged at a Federal level?

Marc
Perhaps the 10th Amendment.

I do not agree with the action of MA and CA in this respect, But it is a law enacted by the state for their respective residents and applies equally to the residents of the respective states. Such is not a federal question.
__________________
charlie
lew1 is offline   Reply With Quote