LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Shadowsix · 05-23-2012, 10:37 PM

You are right rhuff, I should have looked more closely at them. I just went by the recommendations I've read for using them in particular in the Erma's and should have looked at the velocity..

I'll stick with the oiled subsonics & see if the CCI's are good enough to actuate my Kimber .22 1911 conversion (it is particular about some HV ammo).

Thanks Michael. I'm curious, I've read that the KGP-69 was better than the La, ET, or EP models, what is the major difference in them?

05-23-2012, 10:37 PM	#9
Shadowsix User Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 106 Thanks: 56 Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts	You are right rhuff, I should have looked more closely at them. I just went by the recommendations I've read for using them in particular in the Erma's and should have looked at the velocity.. I'll stick with the oiled subsonics & see if the CCI's are good enough to actuate my Kimber .22 1911 conversion (it is particular about some HV ammo). Thanks Michael. I'm curious, I've read that the KGP-69 was better than the La, ET, or EP models, what is the major difference in them?