LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Jan C Still · 03-17-2012, 02:16 PM

Gibson in his book The Krieghoff Parabellum (page 56, 57 and 58) lists the Haenel 122 or fxo accepted magazines as proper for the 1944 Krieghoff. He also indicates that the black plastic bottoms are unmarked.

I have a 1944 Krighoff, sn 11231, that I purchased locally (for a very small price). I traced it down to the vet that picked it from the Krieghoff Factory. It came with a police magazine and holster.

I have picked up two potential proper magazines for this Luger: sn 11230, 122 code and sn 10906 fxo code. However, both have an acceptance stamp that looks like a Krieghoff test proof. Both mags may be incorrect.
Jan

03-17-2012, 02:16 PM	#11
Jan C Still User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Box 240188, Douglas, Alaska, 99824 Posts: 463 Thanks: 0 Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts	Gibson in his book The Krieghoff Parabellum (page 56, 57 and 58) lists the Haenel 122 or fxo accepted magazines as proper for the 1944 Krieghoff. He also indicates that the black plastic bottoms are unmarked. I have a 1944 Krighoff, sn 11231, that I purchased locally (for a very small price). I traced it down to the vet that picked it from the Krieghoff Factory. It came with a police magazine and holster. I have picked up two potential proper magazines for this Luger: sn 11230, 122 code and sn 10906 fxo code. However, both have an acceptance stamp that looks like a Krieghoff test proof. Both mags may be incorrect. Jan