View Single Post
Unread 03-15-2012, 08:08 PM   #8
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kmichaels90 View Post
How could it be a barrel from the 60's or 70's if his grandfather brought it back that way in WWII. Also I have a letter from the atf (they made a bunch of copies for a local gunshop last year), and it states that all c96 mausers, lugers, and inglis highpowers are exempt from needing a tax stamp for the shoulder stock. Because they have been grandfathered in under the law.
Because Grandad simply DID NOT bring the gun in this configuration back from WW2. No gun ever left a Luger factory with a 16" barrel, regardless of family history or lore.
The 16" barrels were produced at the time I mentioned to create a carbine from a 4" barrelled Luger, not to ruin an original Artillery or Navy. It was the only way to create a Carbine cheaply and legally.,

Your mention of the ATF ruling, (which is not news to anybody on this forum), has no bearing on this case.

Last edited by alanint; 03-15-2012 at 08:56 PM.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote