LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Ron Smith · 01-05-2012, 01:04 PM

Possibly a provisional unit mark (no Company designation), and the armorer mis-understood the marking order adding the weapon numbers sequentially for the entire Regt.

Noll's lists weapon numbers into the 200,s , mostly for Reserve Regiments.

01-05-2012, 01:04 PM	#6
Ron Smith User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Orygun Posts: 4,243 Thanks: 118 Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts	Possibly a provisional unit mark (no Company designation), and the armorer mis-understood the marking order adding the weapon numbers sequentially for the entire Regt. Noll's lists weapon numbers into the 200,s , mostly for Reserve Regiments. __________________ I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said...